This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/40017] [4.4/4.5 Regression] stdbool.h/altivec.h
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 4 May 2009 14:30:29 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/40017] [4.4/4.5 Regression] stdbool.h/altivec.h
- References: <bug-40017-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 14:30 -------
I'd say handling _Bool the same way as bool after vector would be a good idea.
It has a disadvantage that in addition to the (I'd say desirable):
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <altivec.h>
...
vector bool int i;
also
vector _Bool int i;
would be accepted, but the advantages IMHO outweight disadvantages.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu dot org,
| |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40017