This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/39652] Trouble with new random bits
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Apr 2009 20:46:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/39652] Trouble with new random bits
- References: <bug-39652-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-04-07 20:46 -------
Subject: Re: Trouble with new random bits
> Well, *cannot* be still an issue exactly in these terms, because there are no
> log2* functions any more in the code...
You are correct. The log2 fails are gone. We are left with the following:
FAIL: 26_numerics/random/knuth_b.cc execution test
FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48.cc execution test
FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48_base.cc execution test
Assertion failed: a() == 1112339016, file
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsui
te/26_numerics/random/knuth_b.cc, line 37
FAIL: 26_numerics/random/knuth_b.cc execution test
Assertion failed: a() == 249142670248501ull, file
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3
/testsuite/26_numerics/random/ranlux48.cc, line 37
FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48.cc execution test
Assertion failed: a() == 61839128582725ull, file
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/
testsuite/26_numerics/random/ranlux48_base.cc, line 37
FAIL: 26_numerics/random/ranlux48_base.cc execution test
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39652