This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/39431] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2093



------- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-11 23:24 -------
The problem is that the memory_operand in the insns also needs registers, and
as the insn before RA has (mem:DI (plus:SI (reg:SI reg1) (reg:SI reg2))), it
needs
2 registers, not just one or zero.  And that is already one too much.  I'd say
we need to handle only a subset of valid memory_operand operands in these 2
patterns, those that need zero or one register.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2009-03-11 17:50:57         |2009-03-11 23:24:02
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39431


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]