This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/35680] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE on invalid transfer in variable declaration



------- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-03 12:12 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
Happily, I have come to the conclusion that the code is invalid no matter which
order the declarations come in;

In a restricted expression... (7.1.6.2):

(7) A reference to an intrinsic function that is
(a) an array inquiry function (13.11.15) other than ALLOCATED,
       ....SIZE in this case....
....
and where each argument of the function is
(a) a restricted expression or
(b) a variable whose properties inquired about are not
the TRANSFER (x, [1]) argument is manifestly not consistent with (b) and should
fail by (a) with exactly the g95 message.

I will make it so.

In fact the ICE is precisely due to the argument not being a restricted
expression, since the size of x and its kind are unavailable to the caller and
the interfacing cannot be made to work.  This is why restricted expressions
only permit dummy, host- or use-associated or common variables and why my
attempts to evaluate the transfer are failing.

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35680


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]