This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Aug 2008 21:31:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
- References: <bug-37170-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #76 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-08-31 21:31 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c
> Is this really a regression?
Yes, but it may not have anything to do with your change. Looking
through my test results, I see it started failing between 136817 and
136971. At 136817, there were no test failures with undefined symbols,
wrong symbol type, etc.
static14.C and static20.C started betweea 137850 and 138833.
I just did a quick scan through the test logs for issues that looked
like they might be related to the current problem.
> What unpatched revision did you use as a baseline?
Your patch was applied to 139805.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170