This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/37276] Trouble with some (C99?) math builtins and namespace std
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Aug 2008 16:01:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/37276] Trouble with some (C99?) math builtins and namespace std
- References: <bug-37276-16141@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-29 16:01 -------
The strict c++98 standard, without GNU extensions, doesn't know anything about
atanh - there isn't a single mention in the entire Standard - therefore I don't
see why any difference is wanted. Even less I see why we want Seg-faults at
run-time. Even less, why we want that in the C++0x era, when C99 math
facilities are on a par with C89 ones.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37276