[Bug middle-end/37170] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c

["eric dot weddington at atmel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com  2008-08-21 19:04 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Patch did not fix any those regressions for the AVR:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?j
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?foo
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-2.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1a
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1b
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1c
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-3.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?ffoo1e
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-4.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1a
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1b
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1c
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1i
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-5.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?vfoo1j
> 

Ok, patched correctly, and verified that the patch does NOT fix the above
regressions.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170