This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap
- From: "gnu at the-meissners dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2008 20:21:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/36907] [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap
- References: <bug-36907-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #20 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 20:21 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:14:35PM -0000, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #19 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-24 20:14 -------
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Gcc failed to bootstrap
> >
> > Yes, I came to the same conclusion when trying a bootstrap. This patch adds a
> > new SECONDARY_OVERRIDE_OPTION to be run in the recursive case, and defined it
> > in the ia64.
> >
>
> Don't we also need it for i386 to handle
>
> /* When scheduling description is not available, disable scheduler pass
> so it won't slow down the compilation and make x87 code slower. */
> if (!TARGET_SCHEDULE)
> flag_schedule_insns_after_reload = flag_schedule_insns = 0;
You are right those should be added.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36907