This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/36918] [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on sparc: assertion failure in options.c
- From: "gnu at the-meissners dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2008 18:49:11 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/36918] [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on sparc: assertion failure in options.c
- References: <bug-36918-279@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from gnu at the-meissners dot org 2008-07-24 18:49 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] Bootstrap failure on
sparc: assertion failure in options.c
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:36:20PM -0000, andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-24 18:36 -------
> I bootstrapped choice 1. No regressions.
>
> I also prefer to save space where possible. So I'd like to avoid choice 3.
>
> Can we also use 255 or 127 as value for DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN?
Just to echo what I said in IRC for bugzilla, right now you can use 255 or 127.
Using 127 is perhaps better in case the default is changed to use signed bytes
in the future, and 127 will work either way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36918