This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/36203] explicit member function template lookup fails from templated function



------- Comment #10 from starlight at binnacle dot cx  2008-05-11 03:29 -------
Oh, and let's not forget about the millions of lines of C++ code 
written for the Windows platform that will *never* be ported to 
Linux.  How's that for a domain of large software systems?  If 
that scary old ambiguity monster was really so bad, why doesn't 
VC<6,7,8,9> enforce the scope rule?  If template member names 
were such a problem, why does VC8 not demand the
'->template f<>()' syntax?

You can mumble bad things about Microsoft all day long, but they 
sell a lot of software and make a *lot* of money supporting a 
commercial realm that's surely much larger than the *nix
world.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36203


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]