This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/35634] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] operand of pre-/postin-/decrement not promoted



------- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-09 14:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=15455)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15455&action=view)
gcc43-pr35634.patch

Here is the updated FE only patch.  One change is that it avoids
P{RE,OST}{IN,DE}CREMENT_EXPR only for the promoting types, and has some
(admittedly very ugly) OpenMP parsing changes to counter that.  Unfortunately
unlike #pragma omp for increment, #pragma omp atomic can have some_lvalue++
, not necessarily a variable_name++, so I have no idea how to handle that.

On x86_64 with this patch I get 3 omp failures (2 in libgomp atomic-10.c, one
in gcc/testsuite atomic-1.c) and:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr18536.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr30771.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-8a.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1
loops" 2
so (depending on where the other patch was tested) doing this in the FE doesn't
help much or at all.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]