This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/35839] [4.4 Regression] Altivec with the vectorizer causes an ICE in rs6000_check_sdmode
- From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Apr 2008 21:10:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/35839] [4.4 Regression] Altivec with the vectorizer causes an ICE in rs6000_check_sdmode
- References: <bug-35839-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-04-08 21:10 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Altivec with the vectorizer causes an ICE in
rs6000_check_sdmode
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2008, at 14:05, "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-04-08 21:05
> -------
> Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Altivec with the vectorizer causes an
> ICE in
> rs6000_check_sdmode
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 8, 2008, at 13:51, "janis at gcc dot gnu dot org"
> <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ------- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-08
>> 20:51 -------
>> My bootstrap on powerpc64-linux worked fine after the fix for 35620
>> went in;
>> see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-04/msg00415.html for
>> revision
>> 133952. Since the following day, however, my bootstraps have failed
>> building
>> 64-bit libgfortran with an ICE for a libgfortran configure check:
>>
>> conftest.F: In function 'main':
>> conftest.F:1: internal compiler error: in
>> rs6000_output_function_epilogue, at
>> config/rs6000/rs6000.c:16855
>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>> configure:10346: $? = 1
>> configure: failed program was:
>> | program main
>> | #ifndef __GNUC__
>> | choke me
>> | #endif
>> |
>> | end
>>
>> It also fails for just
>>
>> program main
>> end
>>
>> I'm doing a regression hunt to find out what caused that.
>
>
> No need this is caused by my rs6000 patch.
Actually I take that back but it was just fixed by David's fix to
rs6000.c.
>
>
>>
>>
>> In the meantime, this has made it more difficult to test the patch
>> to fix the
>> bug I introduced in rs6000_check_sdmode,
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-04/msg00584.html. It seems
>> like an
>> obvious fix but it hasn't yet been reviewed.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35839
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35839
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35839