This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/25477] builtin functions should use $LDBL128 suffix on darwin when appropriate
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Feb 2008 22:28:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/25477] builtin functions should use $LDBL128 suffix on darwin when appropriate
- References: <bug-25477-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #62 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-27 22:28 -------
That new testcase fails under Darwin at -O0 (because of a faulty libm) and
passes with optimization turned on (because the middle-end is very clever). So,
there two solutions are: either have 1 FAIL (-O0) and the rest PASS, like I had
before; or have 1XFAIL and the rest XPASS, which is was we have after my last
commit.
The first situation was clearly better, but I was at work when Dominique
emailed my after my first commit, saying the new testcase FAILed, and I got
confused. I think I'll revert to the old situation, and we'll live with that
one FAIL until Apple fixes the bug or the universe stops expanding and
condenses into a single point of pure energy, whichever happens first. (My
money is on the second guess.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25477