This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/35149] New: ICE: in expand_call_inline, at tree-inline.c:2653


When the attached code is compiled with

g++ -finline -DBOUNDS_CHECK -c ion_recomb_Badnell.ii

you get

/usr/local/gcc430/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../../../include/c++/4.3.0/bits/basic_string.h:
In member function ?T& n_pointer<T, d, 1, ARPA_TYPE, true>::operator[](size_t)
const [with T = t_quantumState, int d = 3]?:
/usr/local/gcc430/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../../../include/c++/4.3.0/bits/basic_string.h:494:
internal compiler error: in expand_call_inline, at tree-inline.c:2653
Please submit a full bug report, ....

g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc430/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc430
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.0 20080201 (experimental) (GCC)

I could reproduce the bug on i686-pc-linux-gnu as well. I only got it with g++
4.3.0, not with 4.2.2, 4.1.2, or 4.0.4.

PS - My apologies for the large test case. I tried to reduce it, but got
totally frustrated because removing code almost invariably made the bug go
away.


-- 
           Summary: ICE: in expand_call_inline, at tree-inline.c:2653
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof at oma dot be


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35149


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]