This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
- From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 17 Jan 2008 21:46:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
- References: <bug-26854-271@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #52 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-17 21:46 -------
Subject: Re: Inordinate compile times on large
routines
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #51 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 21:43 -------
> As this isn't even marked at a regression, you can fix it whenever you like ;)
>
> Only regressions have a target milestone before they are actually fixed,
> though.
>
>
>
just between you and me this is most likely a regression, on the other
hand, i think that people who write functions this large should be
thrown into a pit.
kenny
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854