This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/31780] [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with "complex type" conversion



------- Comment #27 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu  2008-01-07 06:54 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with
"complex type" conversion

"mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| ------- Comment #26 from mark at codesourcery dot com  2008-01-07 01:16
-------
| Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types
|  for ?: with "complex type" conversion
| 
| gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote:
| 
| > I would not bet money that nobody is not using it.  However, that
| > somebody is using something specifically non-standard and NOT
| > documented GNU extension.  
| > 
| > This situatiation is radically very different from the one where the
| > constructor would have been documented as GNU extension 
| 
| It isn't different to the user.

Surely it is.  If it a documented GNU extension, then it is a promise we
must keep.  If it a standard constructor, then we don't have the choice.

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31780


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]