This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/34683] Fortran FE generated IL pessimizes middle-end IL and analysis



------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-06 11:46 -------
As of optimization, the conversion sequence

  atmp.0.data = &A.1;
  D.540_5 = atmp.0.data;
  D.541_6 = (real(kind=4)[0:] *) D.540_5;
...
  (*D.541_6)[S.5_1] = D.545_14;

can be optimized to

  A.1[S.5_1] = D.545_14;

with the following patch that makes sure we use (real(kind=4)[4] *) instead
of the unknown size array type.

Index: trans-types.c
===================================================================
--- trans-types.c       (revision 131336)
+++ trans-types.c       (working copy)
@@ -1511,10 +1511,12 @@ gfc_get_array_type_bounds (tree etype, i
   /* TODO: known offsets for descriptors.  */
   GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_OFFSET (fat_type) = NULL_TREE;

-  /* We define data as an unknown size array. Much better than doing
+  /* We define data as an array with the correct size. Much better than doing
      pointer arithmetic.  */
   arraytype =
-    build_array_type (etype, gfc_array_range_type);
+    build_array_type (etype, build_range_type (gfc_array_index_type,
+       gfc_index_zero_node, int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, stride,
+       integer_one_node, 0)));
   arraytype = build_pointer_type (arraytype);
   GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_DATAPTR_TYPE (fat_type) = arraytype;

(the patch needs to be adjusted for the cases stride is not the actual array
size, but you should get the idea)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34683


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]