This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/34265] Missed optimizations
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Nov 2007 10:40:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/34265] Missed optimizations
- References: <bug-34265-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-11-29 10:40 -------
Richard,
I am not sure to understand your patch in comment #17. I have already in
gcc/passes.c (after your patch in comment #5):
NEXT_PASS (pass_merge_phi);
NEXT_PASS (pass_vrp);
NEXT_PASS (pass_dce);
NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_init);
NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unroll);
NEXT_PASS (pass_tree_loop_done);
NEXT_PASS (pass_cselim);
NEXT_PASS (pass_dominator);
/* The only const/copy propagation opportunities left after
do you mean that I should change
NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unroll);
to
NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unrolli);
? I am assuming my interpretation is correct and rebuild gcc right now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265