This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/33261] gfortran 4.3.0 doesn't work on Windows Vista.
- From: "joerg dot richter at gedas dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Aug 2007 11:28:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/33261] gfortran 4.3.0 doesn't work on Windows Vista.
- References: <bug-33261-15048@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from joerg dot richter at gedas dot de 2007-08-31 11:28 -------
Subject: AW: gfortran 4.3.0 doesn't work on Windows Vi
sta.
I must confess that I only found the 4.2.0 documentation but not the
gfortran 4.2.0 compiler in a comfortable .exe self installing version (I
lost myself in the sourceforge pages). Therefor I downloaded the 4.3.0
version which in fact is easily available as a self-installing .exe version.
But I didn't found and did not expect to found documentation for 4.3.0
(which still is in the developing phase). By the way can You tell me where
to find a plain and simple .exe self installing file of gfortran 4.2.0?
Maybe the error didn't occur at 4.2.0.
Regards and thanks in advance,
Joerg Richter
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 13:14
An: joerg.richter@gedas.de
Betreff: [Bug fortran/33261] gfortran 4.3.0 doesn't work on Windows Vista.
------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 11:14
------- (In reply to comment #2)
> The character between modules and path is a -. I just missed to type
> it into my bugzilla-message.
OK.
> By the way: I did not found the option -fintrinsic-modules-path in the
> currently available gfortran / gcc 4.2.0 documentation at all. Is it a
> hangover from older versions?
Answer to your question: it's not a user option, it's an internal option
used by different parts of the compiler to communicate. (Telling the Fortran
front-end where to find intrinsic modules such as the OpenMP module.)
Now, I have a question myself: why are you referring to 4.2.0? Aren't you
using 4.3.0 compiler? Or do you also have a 4.2 compiler installed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33261