This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/32492] [4.3 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Jun 2007 15:03:07 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/32492] [4.3 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining
- References: <bug-32492-8535@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-06-26 15:03 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] attribute always_inline
-> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 14:53 -------
> I am going to change the component as middle-end while someone figures out if
> we want to promote in the front-ends or later on. I say we want to promote in
> front-ends rather than later on because we get more information about the how
> the arguments would look like (and we might lose some info otherwise).
Sure, but then the frontends should also promote the functions type
signatures. How should the middle-end decide what type is correct?
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32492