This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/32310] Intel-darwin specific ICE on CP2K code
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Jun 2007 08:02:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/32310] Intel-darwin specific ICE on CP2K code
- References: <bug-32310-10259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 08:02 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Are there any equivalences in the the sources for the modules and do they have
> any data statements? Even if they do, I am not sure that I believe that the
> PR29786 patch is involved - how would the module files be compiled if this were
> the case?
I think you're right, I'm sorry for the red herring. I just am completely
puzzled by this ICE. (Just to make sure, I rebuilt a compiler from scratch and
it still fails.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32310