This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/32263] Document the required versions of glibc and binutils
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jun 2007 04:34:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug other/32263] Document the required versions of glibc and binutils
- References: <bug-32263-7959@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-12 04:34 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well here's one example:
>
> http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/lunar-dev/2006-July/005821.html is the error
Actually that is a build failure with glibc. The real question is, does glibc
have requirements. GCC almost has no requirements on what maxium
glibc/binutils version it can be built with. glibc has some requirements
though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32263