This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/32224] [4.3 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_operations, at tree-vect-analyze.c:374
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jun 2007 02:29:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32224] [4.3 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_operations, at tree-vect-analyze.c:374
- References: <bug-32224-12387@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-07 02:29 -------
Caused by:
r120825 | dorit | 2007-01-16 00:26:03 -0800 (Tue, 16 Jan 2007) | 11 lines
* tree-vectorizer.h (is_pattern_stmt_p): New.
* tree-vect-analyze.c (vect_determine_vectorization_factor): Fix
formatting (tabs instead of spaces). Cleanup and clarify setting
of STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE. Call is_pattern_stmt_p.
* tree-vect-transform.c (vect_get_vec_def_for_operand): Fix typo.
(vectorizable_type_demotion): Check that types are integral.
(vectorizable_type_promotion): Likewise.
(vectorizable_store): Fix typo. Eliminate new-line at end of
comments.
When we have an ASM_EXPR, we just skip that statement without rejecting it.
The code looks like:
+ if (vect_print_dump_info (REPORT_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (vect_dump, "==> examining statement: ");
+ print_generic_expr (vect_dump, stmt, TDF_SLIM);
+ }
+
+ if (TREE_CODE (stmt) != GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT)
+ continue;
Now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dorit at il dot ibm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32224