This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers
- From: "tprince at computer dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Apr 2007 16:02:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/31589] gcc.dg/vect failures due to missing target specifiers
- References: <bug-31589-33@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-27 17:02 -------
According to my test of Dorit's updated patch,
the following are now PASS:
vect-iv-9.c
vect-iv-4.c
pr30771.c
The patch changed FAIL to XFAIL for the following
vect-reduc-dot-u16b.c
vect-widen-mult-u16.c
vect-reduc-dot-u16a.c
The following still reports a FAIL:
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c (test for excess errors) Setting
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
:/home/tim/src/gcc-4.3-20070413/ia64/gcc::/home/tim/src/gcc-4.3-20070413/ia64/gcc:/opt/intel/fc/9.1.045/lib:/opt/intel/mpi/3.0/lib
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c execution test
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized
4 loops 1
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times Vectorizing
an unaligned access 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-69.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment
of access forced using peeling 3
Is it possible the xfail pattern does not match ia64-unknown-linux-gnu ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31589