[Bug fortran/31561] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-4.f90

["dorit at il dot ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2007-04-14 09:38 -------
> I think the only thing that really matters is that the loop is vectorized. I
> don't think the alignment details are important checking, even on platforms
> where they are relevant. So we should remove all scan-tree-dump-times except
> the first one, I guess.

I think it's not such a bad idea to check that the handling of alignment is
working as expected. Also, it's relevant both for targets that support
alignment, and for targets that don't, because on those that don't - we can
still vectorize misaligned accesses using loop-versioning. 

> I'm adding Ira and Dorit to the CC list, as they wrote and modified the
> original test. Ira, Dorit, I'm not sure how to proceed here, do you agree with
> the paragraph above about what is the right thing to do?

see - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-04/msg00479.html.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31561