This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc
- From: "dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Feb 2007 12:35:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc
- References: <bug-30768-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #23 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 12:35 -------
(In reply to comment #22)
> Frankly, I think it would make sense to remove completely this XFAIL-ing mess
> and just wait for Diego to fix the compiler issue.
>
Agreed. I don't understand why the rush to XFAIL a test that's obviously
exposing a bug. At most, I would like to understand which patch started
triggering the failure. It can't have been too long ago, the 2-3 day old
mainline tree I have in my box does not have this failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768