This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc



------- Comment #20 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-15 21:43 -------
In reply to comment #19, it's because the dg-bogus test trigs for that target;
it hits the ICE.  As Mark didn't see the fail when testing, and noone else
complained, I originally thought only cris-*-* and perhaps one or two other
targets were affected, but it seems rather universal.  The dg-bogus lines
aren't target-specific; there'd have to be both a "target" and "xfail" for that
to work, and you can only have either one of them.

If you insist that you want to see just the single "original" FAIL for "excess
errors" (with has no further explanation or the note of an open PR it has now),
I can change the test to just be skipped for cris-*-* and you'll see no change
for other targets compared to when the ICE first appeared, as in this PR's
"Description".  Alternatives would be to add targets to the xfail list or
remove it (defaulting to *-*-*) or change to { target { ! <list> } }, but that
can quickly get messy.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]