This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor
- From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Feb 2007 17:19:43 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/7302] -Wnon-virtual-dtor should't complain of protected dtor
- References: <bug-7302-1037@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 17:19 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> Already posted as <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00885.html>,
> with no response.
>
You need to insist. A week is normally considered an acceptable interval
between pings. You need to bootstrap + regression test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing
Short version:
make && make -k check
Then, compare with the output without your patch.
What I normally do is, for an unpatched tree:
make && (make -k check &> pristine)
then patch and do the same saving the output in another file. Compare the two
outputs (there is a compare tests script in the contrib/ directory).
Of course, this is a very dirty and rough explanation. It is better to read the
docs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302