This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
- From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Feb 2007 06:56:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
- References: <bug-29975-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #59 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 06:56 -------
(In reply to comment #58)
> Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K
>
> jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote:
> > ------- Comment #57 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-12 19:18 -------
> >
> >
> >> Yes, that's the one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-02/msg00250.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> > for people reducing the bug, I found that it is in the module cp_fm_pool_types.
> > This indicates the the line number indicated in the segfault would be wrong.
> > Trying to reduce the testcase further, my automatic script got stuck on what is
> > now PR 30779
> >
> >
> >
> OK Yours is one and the same as Daniel's. The backtrace makes that
> completely clear. The fix was posted to the list earlier on today. It
> is just now regtesting - I will commit it before I go to bed tonight.
>
> Thanks for bearing with us.
>
> Paul
>
When you have a moment, could you confirm that all is now well with trunk,
please? Once again, I am sorry about the breakage. Now I see Daniel's
testcase, I realise that I could easily have devised a test... with 20:20
hindsight:)
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975