This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/29568] implement unformatted files with subrecords (Intel style)
- From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 30 Nov 2006 03:32:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/29568] implement unformatted files with subrecords (Intel style)
- References: <bug-29568-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #29 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 03:32 -------
to_write_subrecord = 0
have_written = 0
to_write_subrecord = 0
have_written = 0
to_write_subrecord = 0
have_written = 0
to_write_subrecord = 0
have_written = 0
ad infinitum
Now I wonder if the patch applied correctly. I will be checking that, but we
definitely are broken here. I will keep at it. I did find some gcc warnings
on comparing signed and unsigned integers so I cast those. To no effect.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29568