This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/28691] missed optimization, redundant scalar SSE comparisons
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Aug 2006 06:25:06 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/28691] missed optimization, redundant scalar SSE comparisons
- References: <bug-28691-9709@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 06:25 -------
Hmm, now it is because the order int the compares are different:
418f01: comiss %xmm0,%xmm1
418f04: seta %al
418f07: comiss %xmm1,%xmm0
see how the first is xmm0, xmm1 While the second is xmm1, xmm0.
Can you file a seperate bug with the source to that function (and make sure it
compiles on its own) because that is a different bug as far as I can tell?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28691