This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/27574] [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor
- From: "drow at false dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Jul 2006 20:12:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/27574] [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor
- References: <bug-27574-5394@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #14 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 20:12 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local
variable in a C++ constructor
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:29:38PM -0000, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> The problem appeared from r96653 to r96654; AFAICT this is the gcc-patches
> posting for the associated patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01709.html
Jan and Dan Berlin suggested that the right fix for this bug might be
to not register the uncloned constructor with cgraph, only the clones.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574