[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

["wieseltux23 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #16 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-15 18:01 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error:
 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

http://en.fon.com/

On 15 Jul 2006 16:25:10 -0000
"ams at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:25 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
>    > Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?
> 
>    Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
> */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
> the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
> change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
> parties, and it is clean.
> 
> If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like
> GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with
> patches being neglected (mostly by me).
> 
> Happy hacking.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102