This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/26830] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Insane amount of compile-time / memory needed at -O1 and above



------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-24 08:43 -------
Ok, without -fno-tree-salias things are just worse, not different:

 tree copy propagation : 134.88 ( 2%) usr   0.67 (10%) sys 136.04 ( 2%) wall   
6573 kB ( 0%) ggc
 tree store copy prop  :  26.55 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 0%) sys  26.56 ( 0%) wall   
1602 kB ( 0%) ggc
 tree PHI insertion    :  75.16 ( 1%) usr   1.80 (27%) sys  76.97 ( 1%) wall
1512507 kB (76%) ggc
 tree SSA rewrite      :6874.42 (89%) usr   0.20 ( 3%) sys6875.24 (89%) wall  
22257 kB ( 1%) ggc
 tree SSA incremental  : 281.55 ( 4%) usr   0.11 ( 2%) sys 281.64 ( 4%) wall  
10460 kB ( 1%) ggc
 dominator optimization:  65.92 ( 1%) usr   0.03 ( 0%) sys  65.96 ( 1%) wall  
20197 kB ( 1%) ggc
 tree loop init        :  30.19 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys  30.20 ( 0%) wall   
   9 kB ( 0%) ggc
 tree SSA uncprop      :  28.22 ( 0%) usr   0.01 ( 0%) sys  28.22 ( 0%) wall   
   0 kB ( 0%) ggc
 dominance frontiers   :  21.44 ( 0%) usr   0.02 ( 0%) sys  21.40 ( 0%) wall   
   0 kB ( 0%) ggc
 expand                :  61.70 ( 1%) usr   0.07 ( 1%) sys  61.83 ( 1%) wall  
49925 kB ( 3%) ggc
 TOTAL                 :7709.86             6.60          7717.99           
1990005 kB

(that was ia64 with 4.1.0, sorry)

I believe there's something wrong with the data-structures compared to what
we had in 4.0.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26830


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]