This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/25569] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops



------- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com  2006-03-10 19:37 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] FAIL:
        gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops

On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 00:07 +0000, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> 
> ------- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-08 00:07 -------
> A regression hunt on powerpc64-linux using the C test case from comment #4
> identified this patch:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=110705
> 
> r110705 | law | 2006-02-07 18:31:27 +0000 (Tue, 07 Feb 2006)
> 
> 
> That date doesn't match up with when the Fortran test started failing so I ran
> another regression hunt using it, which identified this patch:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=108425
> 
> r108425 | law | 2005-12-12 19:59:16 +0000 (Mon, 12 Dec 2005)
Just an FYI -- I probably won't be able to start looking at this
until Monday.  Hopefully it'll be something I can hunt down
with a cross compiler as I don't have a ppc64 box :-)

jeff


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25569


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]