This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/26361] [4.2 regression] bootstrap failure on Alpha: xgcc runs out of memory compiling libiberty/md5.c
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Feb 2006 20:35:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26361] [4.2 regression] bootstrap failure on Alpha: xgcc runs out of memory compiling libiberty/md5.c
- References: <bug-26361-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 20:34 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> No, because if it's marked as varying we will not use it to
> refine any other VRP ranges.
But this is an unsigned value which is varrying. [0, +INF] for an unsigned
value is varrying, I don't see why it would not be marked as such.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26361