This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libfortran/24903] dotprod should use conj?



------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-21 09:11 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> conjga = conj(*pa);
> or
> conjga = conjl(*pa);
> or
> conjga = conjf(*pa);

I'm ready to do that, but since complex numbers in C are always a pain, I want
to know: are we sure that conj/conjf/conjl are *always* available? I mean, are
they part of the things gcc provides even if there is no library support for
them in the runtime libm?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24903


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]