This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/23991] [4.1 Regression]: Gcc failed to build on ia64
- From: "ian at airs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Sep 2005 19:30:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/23991] [4.1 Regression]: Gcc failed to build on ia64
- References: <20050921100151.23991.hjl@lucon.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-09-21 19:30 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression]: Gcc failed to build on ia64
Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
> On Sep 21, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> > Joern RENNECKE <joern.rennecke@st.com> writes:
> >
> >> 2005-09-21 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@st.com>
> >>
> >> * final.c (get_attr_length_1): In !HAVE_ATTR_length case, define as
> >> macro. Don't attach ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED to arguments.
> >> (get_attr_length, get_attr_min_length): Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
> >
> > Ick, don't do that. Suppose you just #define insn_default_length and
> > insn_min_length as macros ifndef HAVE_ATTR_length.
>
>
> Of course both insn_default_length and insn_min_length are used as
> functions
> in this situation.
Hmmm, right. Bother. Still doable, but uglier.
Ian
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23991