This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/23906] inappropriate branch condition in function "transform_sections" in "dependency.c"
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Sep 2005 03:26:58 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/23906] inappropriate branch condition in function "transform_sections" in "dependency.c"
- References: <20050915224815.23906.skyhover@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 03:26 -------
This looks like a bug. However I don't agree with this analysis.
We should be applying the same transformation to both l and r.
Also, multiplying then dividing by the same value makes no sense.
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16 03:26 -------
Subject: Bug 23906
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: pbrook@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-16 03:26:37
Modified files:
gcc/fortran : ChangeLog dependency.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: dependency_1.f90
Log message:
2005-09-16 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/23906
fortran/
* dependency.c (transform_sections): Divide by correct value.
Elaborate comment.
testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/dependency_1.f90: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.555&r2=1.556
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/dependency.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6069&r2=1.6070
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dependency_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-09-16 03:26:54
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23906