This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/22635] OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2005 04:59:53 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/22635] OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees
- References: <20050723202503.22635.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-24 04:59 -------
I would imagine that in real world, there are either a rather small number
of overloads of a name (less than five) or very many (more than 20 or 30).
Most code I've seen don't use many overloads (falling into the first class)
but there are a few cases in libstdc++, especially in the streams and strings
libraries, that use very many overloads. I don't know if knowledge of such
overload set size statistics help any in finding an appropriate data
structure,
though...
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22635