This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/21286] [4.0/4.1 Regression] filebuf::xsgetn vs pipes
- From: "ralfixx at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Jul 2005 15:01:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/21286] [4.0/4.1 Regression] filebuf::xsgetn vs pipes
- References: <20050429155408.21286.ralfixx@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From ralfixx at gmx dot de 2005-07-18 15:01 -------
> portable C++ code using pipes has better being very very
> careful with short reads, because the current Standard is
> way too vague in this area
I prefer C++ for the abstractions it allows. Having to code my I/O with the
type of the underlying data stream type in mind defeats this abstraction to a
great deal...
> By the way, I would suggest pronouncing "broken" using the same
> intonation of Martin Landau's Bela Lugosi in Ed Wood:
> "Beware, beware... broken, broken..." ;)
Let's pronounce it [kəˈpʊt] then :-)
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Kaput
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21286