This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
- From: "g_bugz at zewt dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 May 2005 23:26:10 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
- References: <20040131115251.13943.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From g_bugz at zewt dot org 2005-05-21 23:26 -------
(Awesome. I spend ten minutes typing out a response, the tracker goes "you
can't do that!", and I lose it all. Only Debian gets their tracker right ...)
(Very old response, since the fact that this was closed was just forwarded to
me through Debian earlier today.)
I believe the merge with 13924 was in error; it talks about partial
definitions, which is unrelated to this problem (which does not go away if
<cmath> is also included). In this test case, abs() and labs() work fine; only
llabs() (and, I think, other C99 math functions, eg. lldiv) fails.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13943