This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/21389] optimized code seg faults due to double load on sparcV9


------- Additional Comments From drew dot johnson at andrew dot com  2005-05-06 19:04 -------
Subject: RE:  optimized code seg faults due to double load on sparcV9

I don't think so.  Malloc does not guarantee anything but mod-4
alignment.  You have to use memalign to get something better (at least
on a Sun).  I only did the +4 pointer stuff to ensure that the double
would be misaligned mod8, as this is what was happening in my code.  As
long as I am on a mod4 boundary for my struct, the -munaligned-doubles
flag should force the handling of doubles as though they are unaligned.
The compiler with no optimization does this.  But as soon as you turn on
-O1, it ignores the unaligned-doubles directive.

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] 
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:55 PM
To: Johnson, Drew
Subject: [Bug target/21389] optimized code seg faults due to double load
on sparcV9


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-06 18:54 -------
I think you violating alignment rules in C:

	x = tptr[1].f3;
	p = (char *)tptr;
	p += 4;
	tptr = (test1 *)p;

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21389

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21389


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]