This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/20323] optional arguments incorrectly accepted in specification expressions


------- Additional Comments From tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk  2005-03-09 16:11 -------
 (In reply to comment #1) 
> The complaint is a segfault at runtime when 
> you actually want to do anything with the 
> string whose length depends on a missing 
> optional argument.  This isn't too bad (the 
> same thing happens if you access a missing 
> optional argument). 
 
Indeed - but even if the optional argument were present, you're still not 
allowed to access it in a specification expression, and this is a constraint 
that the compiler is required to detect at compile time. (It's a constraint 
that I'd quite like to see partially lifted - it would be very useful to be 
able to use present(arg) as part of a specification expression -  but it is 
forbidden according to the current standard.) 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20323


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]