This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/19663] LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC doesn't play nice with RTEMS
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jan 2005 15:17:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/19663] LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC doesn't play nice with RTEMS
- References: <20050128055156.19663.corsepiu@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28 15:17 -------
> Then I don't understand, why it's exactly them which apply a similar
> work-around as RTEMS does:
> # grep LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC *.h
> linux64.h:#undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC
> linux64.h:#define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \
> linux.h:#undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC
> linux.h:#define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \
> rtemself.h:#undef LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC
>
> I.e. linux* and rtems are having this issue, while others don't seem to have
> this issue.
Because the others don't use (a recent) GNU libc according to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19663