This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/19544] Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jan 2005 19:42:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/19544] Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
- References: <20050120125055.19544.chris@bubblescope.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-01-20 19:42 -------
Subject: Re: Difference in behaviour if default constructor added
"chris at bubblescope dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| I'm still curious as to why the error doesn't appear if let g++ generate a
| default constructor, as from my reading of 12.1/7, the default generated
| constructor should be "ptr() {}", so the error should still appear. Am I reading
| it wrong?
The syntax "ptr()" invokes value initialization, which has the effect of
initializing ptr to zero. See the relevant section in the standard.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19544