This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jan 2005 04:47:32 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call
- References: <20041214154235.18987.schwab@suse.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-01-08 04:47 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call
"wilson at specifixinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| > according to http://bugs.debian.org/286840 (if that's the same thing), this is
| > broken in gcc-3.3 CVS and gcc-3.4 CVS as well. Latest known working version is
| > gcc-3.3.5.
|
| The patch in question is PR 13158. I added it to mainline, but did not
| add it to gcc-3.4 CVS because technically it is not a regression, and
| hence the rules do not seem to permit me to add it there without special
| permission. For gcc-3.3 CVS, I need the branch maintainer's permission,
| and I did not get it, though I did not try very hard, so it isn't on the
| gcc-3.3 CVS branch either. Red Hat did add it to gcc-3_4-rhl-branch.
I must have missed that patch then.
| Someone probably added it to the debian gcc sources as a patch on top of
| the FSF tree, so for gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 this will have to be fixed on
| the debian side by adding the patch in this PR also.
then, if it is 3.4.x it should go into 3.3.x too.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18987