[Bug c++/19244] New: Typedef of anonymous class incorrectly handled in member function definition

["austern at apple dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

gcc 4.0 incorrectly rejects the following valid code:
typedef struct { void f(); } f;
void f::f() { }

It treats f::f as referring to a constructor, and then gets confused because this isn't the right syntax for 
a constructor definition.  However (12.1/3), "a typedef-name that names a class shall not be used as 
the identifier in the declarator for a constructor declaration."

Note that this only happens for an anonymous class.  If I instead write
typedef struct e { void f(); } f;
then this compiles without error.

This is a regression.  3.3 handles this correctly.

-- 
           Summary: Typedef of anonymous class incorrectly handled in member
                    function definition
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: austern at apple dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0
  GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0
GCC target triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19244