This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/13776] [4.0 Regression] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 4.0-tree-ssa 040120
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Nov 2004 21:12:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/13776] [4.0 Regression] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 4.0-tree-ssa 040120
- References: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18 21:12 -------
Hmm, with the mainline on PPC-darwin for ir.ii at -O0 we are faster than both 3.3 and 3.1.
3.1:
51.260u 2.110s 0:56.27 94.8% 0+0k 0+7io 0pf+0w
3.3:
46.000u 3.600s 0:50.91 97.4% 0+0k 0+7io 0pf+0w
mainline:
39.730u 5.270s 0:48.27 93.2% 0+0k 0+8io 0pf+0w
Even at -O1 we are faster than 3.3:
mainline:
70.860u 5.010s 1:18.76 96.3% 0+0k 0+11io 0pf+0w
3.3:
72.650u 13.250s 1:29.99 95.4% 0+0k 0+7io 0pf+0w
For -O2 we are only 1 second slower than 3.3:
mainline:
99.720u 5.510s 1:54.78 91.6% 0+0k 0+13io 0pf+0w
3.3:
98.610u 38.800s 2:25.59 94.3% 0+0k 0+15io 0pf+0w
Could you check again on your platform?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776