This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/17278] [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
- From: "kgardas at objectsecurity dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Oct 2004 13:06:06 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/17278] [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
- References: <20040902085559.17278.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2004-10-25 13:06 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] 24% C++ compile-time regression
in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
Yes, but this only apply to typecode.cc. If you consider ir.cc, you will
need to increase from 40 to 44% and since subject does not talk about
typecode.cc, I would consider leaving it at 40% better option for now...
Cheers,
Karel
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278